HOME
What is CHIRALTEM
2nd CHIRALTEM workshop

3rd CHIRALTEM workshop

NEW: get together at DPG conference

Partner:

- Vienna - Regensburg -

- Dresden - Prag - Trieste -

Publications

 

 
Workpackages


Workpackage 1

Goal: Demonstrate circular dichroism using the biprism in condenser system.
Status: Progressing, interference fringes of desired fringe spacing were achieved.

See "Status Quo"<link> for more details.


Workpackage 2

Goal: Preparation of suitable specimens for measurements of circular dichroism.
Status: Suspended.

Note: I have tried to prepare a specimen of a commercial harddisk, but I did not succeeded yet. The glass plate of the disk is very brittle so it breaks when I grind or polish it to electron transparency. It is also resistant to hydrofluoric acid so it cannot be etched. Any hints for specimen preparation are welcome at petr dot formanek at tu-dresden dot de.


Workpackage 3

Goal: Optimise experimental setup.
Status: WP3 will be started after finishing WP1.

Status Quo


Introduction

One of the experimental setups, at which circular dichroism can be measured, is realized when a suitable specimen is illuminated by a system of interference fringes with a spacing adapted to the object structure and with a controllable position of the fringes. This is achieved by means of two overlapping coherent electron beams, where the mutual angle of propagation and mutual phase shift has to be controlled. Such an illumination of the specimen can be achieved by placing a biprism into a condenser system of the microscope.

The Möllenstedt-type biprism [1] is analogous to the optical biprism (Fig. 1). It consists of a positively biased thin filament (diameter less than a micrometer) placed between two grounded plates. The electric field around the filament deflects the electron waves, so that they interfere below the biprism. The ingenuity of the biprism is that the deflection angle is independent of the distance of the electrons from the filament and that the biprism has virtually no aberrations. The deflection angle is proportional to the voltage Ubp between the filament and the plates

, (1)

with the deflection coefficient dependent on biprism dimensions.

Fig. 1 Principle of biprism operation.


The important parameters of an interference pattern are fringe spacing S, interference width W, and fringe contrast V (Fig. 2). The contrast is defined as

, (2)

where Imax is the maximum and Imin the minimum intensity of the interference fringes.


Fig. 2 Latex spheres and gold nanocrystals on a holy carbon foil illuminated with two interfering electron beams.

Fringe spacing, interference width and fringe contrast can be controlled by the distance a of the crossover from the biprism, by the distance b of the image plane from the biprism, and by the biprism voltage Ubp [2] (Fig. 3).

, (3)

, (4)

, (5)

where rf is the filament radius, r0 is the effective radius of the emitting area in the electron source, and is the wavelength.



Fig. 3 Geometric construction of virtual sources S1, S2, which arise due to beam splitting by the biprism.

The biprism is placed in the condenser system, which consists of 4 lenses (Fig. 4). By adjusting focal length of the lenses (through varying current in the lenses) and biprism voltage one can (hopefully) adjust S, W, V so that the measurement of circular dichroism is possible.

Fig. 4 Scheme of the condenser system.

Although we have a lot of experience with the biprism mounted below the objective lens for holographic measurements [2], we presently have only few experiences with a biprism in the illumination system. We have found several problems that we describe further in the following.

Biprism Holder

The standard biprism holder, which is designed to be mounted in the first intermediate image plane (below the objective lens), is too big for the Condenser-2 port of the microscope (above the objective lens) - Fig 5. A down-scaled copy of the standard holder that would fit in a C2 port is hardly manufacturable. Therefore we developed a new construction (Figs. 6 - 8), which can be manufactured in smaller dimensions, and which is in addition more resistant against flashovers [3].

Fig. 5 Comparison of dimensions of a standard C2 aperture holder (top) and standard biprism holder (bottom).

Fig. 6 Comparison of old (left) and new (right) biprism holder construction.
Old construction. The biprism is soldered by means of a silver paste on 2 rivets glued into insulation cylinders. The holes in the holder, necessary for the isolation, weaken the stiffness of the holder, which is only 1 mm thick at the biprism. Each rivet is contacted at the bottom of the holder with a thin wire. The wires are glued in the grooves. Flashovers often happen at the contact points between the wires and the rivets.
New construction. Assembling the new construction: (1) A U-shaped electrode is glued in a supporting stand in the form of a rectangular block with two holes parallel to the axis of the holder. (2) The supporting stand is fastened with a screw to the holder head. The electrode is contacted in one point only with a silver paste at the crook of the 'U'. (3) The biprism is attached to the U-shaped electrode with a silver paste.


Fig. 7 Technical drawing of the improved biprism holder.

Fig. 8 Photograph of the improved biprism holder.



Introduction into Function of Electromagnetic Lenses

The C2 port of the microscope is placed in the middle of the Condenser 2 lens, i.e. the biprism is placed inside the lens. Since there is no corresponding theory of such a system reported in the literature, imaging properties of a biprism in a lens were calculated [4]<link1>. The conclusion of the calculations is: In an approximation valid for thin lenses and a thin biprism, the system biprism-inside-a-lens is optically equivalent to the system biprism-just-behind-the-lens. In order to better understand the electron optics two programs <link2><link3> were written for live visualization of electron trajectories in a lens and in the system of lenses while varying the parameters of the lenses or of the beam (Fig. 9, 10).

Fig. 9 Screenshot of program visualising beam paths in an electromagnetic lens with a built-in biprism.

Fig. 10 Screenshot of program visualising beam paths in a condenser system.


Exploring Possible Setups

After insertion of the biprism in the C2 port of the microscope and applying a voltage to it, interference fringes with spacings of 5 nm to 40 nm are observable [3]. However, for the measurement of the dichroic signal, fringe spacings of either ~ 0.1 nm or ~ 200 nm are necessary. This could, in principle, be achieved by a corresponding setup of the condenser system, i.e. by deflection angle of the biprism (controlled by the voltage on the biprism), by focal lengths of the Condenser 1, Condenser 2 and Minicondenser lenses (controlled by currents through the lenses), as well as by axially moving the first image of the electron gun - "the crossover" (controlled by gun lens voltage and extraction voltage). This means optimizing 6 parameters is needed.

Even though we put a large effort to reach the desirable fringe spacing by varying various microscope parameters, we did not succeed to reach the necessary fringe spacing. It turned out that the condenser system is so complicate that it cannot be adjusted intuitively. We used a model of the system within thin lens approximation (provided by FEI Company), which enabled us to explore all possible setups by brute force method - i.e. just by varying all possible parameters. The result of the simulations and experiments are summarized in Fig. 11. It shows that desired fringe spacing is not achievable in a high-resolution mode of the microscope. The graph in Fig. 11 should be understood as follows.

The width of the interference field W is a linear function of the biprism voltage Ubp (Cf. Eq. 3):

, (6)

and the fringe spacing S is indirectly proportional to the biprism voltage (Cf. Eq. 4):

, (7)

These two relationships can be plotted in a W-S diagram (Fig. 11) by the means of a set of parametric curves, the parameter of which is the biprism voltage. The position of a curve is given by the constants A, B, C, which in turn depend on the actual configuration of the condenser system (position of the crossover, excitation of the condenser lenses). By trying all possible combinations of the adjustable parameters, the curve moves in the diagram, filling an area that defines accessible fringe spacings S and interference widths W.

The dashed red line in Fig. 11 marks fringe spacings and interference widths achievable with a standard objective lens (SuperTwin lens) and a biprism placed in the second condenser aperture (C2-aperture). It is obvious that this configuration does not allow reaching the desirable fringe spacings. The achievable area would move right-upwards (overlapping the area for the CHIRALTEM), if the biprism were placed in the first condenser aperture (C1-aperture). Since the C1-aperture is placed in the ultra-high-vacuum part of the microscope, any changes must be done by a service engineer.

But finally, we found that switching the objective lens off (Low Magnification mode) is a way to approach the desired fringe spacing of ~ 200 nm - the area marked by the blue dotted line in Fig. 11. Optionally, one can use the Lorentz objective lens [6], to win back the degree of freedom that was lost by switching the objective lens off. An image of 200 nm fringes is displayed in Fig. 12.


Fig. 11 Interference width W vs. fringe spacing S in specimen plane in a FEI CM200 series microscope for different excitations of the C2 lens. Curves with symbols show experimental data (Extraction voltage 3.81kV, gun lens 3, spot size 3, excitation of second condenser lens C2 given in % of maximal lens current), the lines are calculations within thin lens model. The dashed red line marks an envelope of curves for possible microscope configurations achievable with a SuperTwin lens and a biprism in the second condenser aperture. Similarly, the dotted blue line marks the area accessible with a Lorentz lens. The orange parallelogram denotes the area suitable for CHIRALTEM. The forbidden area is defined by S < W, i.e. less than one fringe in the interference field.

Fig. 12 Latex spheres of diameter 204 nm on a carbon foil illuminated by two interfering beams with a fringe spacing of about 200 nm.


Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to Dr. Peter Tiemeijer from FEI Company for providing the information necessary to progress the project.


References

[1] G. Möllenstedt, H. Düker, "Fresnelscher Interferenzversuch mit einem Biprisma für Elektronenwellen", Zeitschr. für Physik 42 (1955) 41

[2] M. Lehmann, H. Lichte, "Tutorial on Off-axis Electron Holography", Microscopy and Microanalysis 8 (2002) 447

[3] P. Formanek, B. Einenkel, H. Lichte, "An improved construction of electron biprism holder for the C2-aperture" Proc. Microscopy Conference MC2005, Davos, Switzerland, p. 30

[4] <link1>

[5] P. Formanek, B. Einenkel, H. Lichte, "Biprism in condenser system for coherent two-beam illumination of an object", Proc. Microscopy Conference MC2005, Davos, Switzerland, p. 31

[6] J. Zweck, B. Bormans, "The CM30 Lorentz Lens", Philips Electron Optics Bulletin 132 (1992) 1


     
Here you find some informations for download

An improved construction of electron biprism holder for the C2-aperture(PDF)

   

Biprism in condenser system for coherent two-beam illumination of an object(PDF)